![]() ![]() The usually superior Yahoo! and Bing do the same, though the latter places a Yahoo! Movies page for the Disney film first of all, which Google awards to the Peter Pan Bus Company. For "Peter Pan", the world's loathsome leading search engine returns an IMDb listing for the 2003 live-action film ahead of the one for Disney's version. There may be two different adaptations competing at this month's Oscars, but a discussion of Snow White has to begin with Disney's pioneering animated feature. Winnie the Pooh may be one of literature's most celebrated characters, but it's Disney's version that is ubiquitous and not even from one specific short or film. If someone mentions "Pinocchio", you assume they're talking about Disney's charming classic before Carlo Collodi's original novel. Typically, Disney's animated adaptations emerge as the definitive versions of stories. I eventually decided on ownership, as in Disney lays a weaker ownership claim to the contents of Peter Pan than most of their films. That wasn't even drastically different from the fairy tales that Disney put their spin on, from those gathered by the Brothers Grimm to something with clearer origins like Pinocchio. Not long before and after this, Disney had tapped famous works of English literature for movies like Alice in Wonderland and The Jungle Book. Barrie's turn-of-the-20th century play and novel. One of the company's best-known films, this 1953 release was based on a well-known source, J.M. For the purposes of this review, I struggled to come up with a feature that distinguished Peter Pan from the other Disney animated classics of Walt's time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |